There are 1 replies, with the last one on 06/12/2008 at 1:50:58 PM by joe_elway Quote: Yes, but it depends on who owns SCCM. The admins can set permissions on the collections (think of them as groups that are built using queries from discovery and audit information). One collection for servers and one for desktops. The problem here is, who owns SCCM and can you trust them? It should be architected kind of like AD: limited admins, delegated rights. SCCM - for a larger environment it might make more sense to use SCCM depending on what you want. It still relies on WSUS being there. But it gives you better targeting, delegation and much more reporting. Also, by using packages/programs and advertisements, you can uninstall patches that don’t work. Other big perk … you can deploy updates other than just MS ones. You can publish your own or even ones from other companies. Adobe and Citrix were meant to be getting involved. I think Dell were too.

More here: WSUS -vs- SCCM w/WSUS

Related posts

• WSUS coverage report (0)
• What narks you about Windows? (0)
• DNS and/or Kerberos problems? (0)
• synchronization of WSUS (0)
• PCs showing as hosts offering ldap??? (0)